<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000nam a2200000 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-99849408841423002</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220719100222.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">c| |||||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">220718s2018    enk     r   b 001 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">9781108413114 (paperback)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">20562186</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DLC</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">DLAW</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">KF 5407</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">M38 2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mashaw, Jerry L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">how administrative law supports democratic government</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Jerry L. Mashaw.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Cambrdige, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">ix, 201 pages</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">nc</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Machine generated contents note: 1. Why reasons; 2. The rise of reason giving; 3. Reasons, reasonableness and accountability in American administrative law: the basic legal framework; 4. Reasonableness, accountability and the control of administrative policy; 5. Reasons, reasonableness and judicial review; 6. Reasons, administration and politics; 7. Reasoned administration and democratic legitimacy; 8. Reason and regret.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;Preface and Acknowledgements Critiques of administrative governance go back at least to the Jeffersonian Republicans' objections to the creation of the First Bank of the United States. And, like those early &quot;Democrats&quot; laments, critical commentary is often focused on a presumed democratic deficit. For many, countering the pernicious effects of &quot;big government&quot;, and re-establishing democracy and the rule of law, entails returning lawmaking to Congress and the judiciary. These complaints continue unabated in the academic literature, judicial decisions and popular political discourse. For example, conservative legalists have embraced Philip Hamburger's book, &quot;Is Administrative Law Unlawful?&quot; (answer yes) notwithstanding Hamburger's thoroughgoing misunderstanding of both modern American administrative law, and the functioning of seventeenth century royal prerogative to which Hamburger compared our modern administrative jurisprudence. No less than the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in with his own concerns the Americans now live in a gigantic and all-powerful administrative state. As these words are written multiple bills are before Congress that would, among other things, make all significant agency regulations ineffective unless specifically approved by Congress and instruct reviewing courts to give agency interpretations of their organic statutes no deference upon judicial review&quot;--</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government explores the fundamental bases for the legitimacy of the modern administrative state. While some have argued that modern administrative states are a threat to liberty and at war with democratic governance, Jerry L. Mashaw demonstrates that in fact reasoned administration is more respectful of rights and equal citizenship and truer to democratic values than lawmaking by either courts or legislatures. His account features the law's demand for reason giving and reasonableness as the crucial criterion for the legality of administrative action. In an argument combining history, sociology, political theory and law, this book demonstrates how administrative law's demand for reasoned administration structures administrative decision-making, empowers actors within and outside the government, and supports a complex vision of democratic self-rule&quot;--</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Administrative agencies</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Administrative law</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Administrative procedure</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Democracy</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DLAW</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">KF 5407</subfield>
   <subfield code="i">M38 2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Book</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
