<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000ctm a2200000 c 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-99796217613217940</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20230404105834.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a           ||| u </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230404s2017    ph a   grm    000 0deng||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPD-00429665692</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">TMC</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DMLUC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">LG 995 2017 T4 </subfield>
   <subfield code="b">V55</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Villanueva, Asela Linglingay R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative assessment of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of US, Israel, UK, China, India, Singapore and Philippines</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Asela Linglingay R. Villanueva.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Quezon City</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">University of the Philippines Diliman, Technology Management Center</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">2017.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">90 leaves</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In partial fulfillment of the requirements of TM 299</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Master of Technology Management</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">University of the Philippines</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This thesis is available to the general public.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper will assess and discuss the global entrepreneurial ecosystems of countries with strong entrepreneurial enterprises such as United States (US), Israel, United Kingdom (UK), China, India and Singapore. Entrepreneurial ecosystem is defined as a set of interdependent actors and factors coordinated in such a way that they enable productive entrepreneurship within a particular territory. The economic growth optimism and the promise of jobs that entrepreneurs bring as supported by government efforts to create opportunity and prosperity has generated an extraordinary increase in empowering the entrepreneurial ecosystems which remains to be economically relevant and dynamic.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moreover, this paper provides a review on the components of entrepreneurial ecosystem, elements, approaches, framework, measurement and other relevant information. Through the comprehensive qualitative and quantitative research conducted, data were analyzed to come up with a comparative assessment which can be used by entrepreneurs for decision making, strategy formulation or as a guide for their technology improvement. To boost the study, local entrepreneurial ecosystem condition was also incorporated and assessed to relate the current condition with the intervention and initiatives done by the government. The paper concludes the discussion of strong and weakest aspect of the entrepreneurial ecosystem of the countries being studied.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Entrepreneurship.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparative management.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="658" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Special projects in Technology Management.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Talisayon, Serafin D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">adviser.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="842" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Book</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">TMC</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">LG 995 2017 T4</subfield>
   <subfield code="i">V55</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Book</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
