<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-99796217611235720</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231008001401.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a    grb    001 u|</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140429s        xx     d | ||r |||||   ||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DENG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Colosimo, Bianca M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">From profile to surface monitoring</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">SPC for cylindrical surfaces via Gaussian processes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 95-113</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Quality of machined products is often related to the shapes of surfaces that are constrained by geometric tolerances. In this case, statistical quality monitoring should be used to quickly detect unwanted deviations from the nominal pattern. The majority of the literature has focused on statistical profile monitoring, while there is little research on surface monitoring. This paper faces the challenging task of moving from profile to surface monitoring. To this aim, different parametric approaches and control charting procedures are presented and compared with reference to a real case study dealing with cylindrical surfaces obtained by lathe turning. In particular, a novel method presented in this paper consists of modeling the manufactured surface via Gaussian processes models and monitoring the deviations of the actual surface from the target pattern estimated in phase I. Regardless of the specific case study in this paper, the proposed approach is general and can be extended to deal with different kinds of surfaces or profiles.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cylindrical Surfaces.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Geometric Specifications.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">GP Model.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kriging.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Profile Monitoring.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Spatial Statistics.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Quality Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46, 2 (2014).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DENG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
