<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-99796217608682654</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231007234637.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m    |o  d |      </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">090202s        xx     d | ||r |||||   ||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPD-00073797372</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DENGII</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Chawathe, Yatin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Making gnutella-like P2P systems scalable.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 407-418</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Napster pioneered the idea of peer-to-peer file sharing, and supported it with a centralized file search facility. Subsequent P2P systems like Gnutella adopted decentralized search algorithms. However, Gnutella's notoriously poor scaling led some to propose distributed hash table solutions to the wide-area file search problem. Contrary to that trend, we advocate retaining Gnutella's simplicity while proposing new mechanisms that greatly improve its scalability. Building upon prior research [1, 12, 22], we propose several modifications to Gnutella's design that dynamically adapt the overlay topology and the search algorithms in order to accommodate the natural heterogeneity present in most peer-to-peer systems. We test our design through simulations and the results show three to five orders of magnitude improvement in total system capacity. We also report on a prototype implementation and its deployment on a testbed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Computer systems organization.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Computer communication networks.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Algorithms.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Design.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Experimentation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Performance.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Computer communication review.</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">33, 4 (2003).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DENG-II</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
