<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-99796217608667383</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231007234628.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m    |o  d |      </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">090127s        xx     d | ||r |||||   ||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPD-00073796778</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DENGII</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Björkman, Mats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Locking effects in multiprocessor implementations of protocols.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 74-83</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We investigate how to exploit shared memory multiprocessors for parallel protocol processing. We present a multiprocessor implementation of the x-kernel protocol environment from the University of Arizona. A &quot;processor-per-message&quot; paradigm is used to partition the work over processors. Locks are used to protect shared protocol state and data. Mutual exclusion by locking can be costly if the parallel protocol code frequently accesses shared state and data. This paper addresses the effect of locking on performance.The x-kernel is implemented in user address space on a Sequent Symmetry. Performance results of UDP/IP and TCP/IP are given, and we compare them to performance predictions from simulations. The measured speedups for the parallel implementations relative to the sequential ones are more than 12 times for UDP and 3 times for TCP. These limits are set by locking and machine contention.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Computer systems organization.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Computer communication networks.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Network protocols.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">TCP IP.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Processor architectures.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Multiple Data Stream Architectures (Multiprocessors).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Parallel processors.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Performance of systems.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Performance attributes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Design.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Measurement.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Performance.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Computer communication review.</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23, 4 (1993).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DENG-II</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
