<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000ctm a22000004a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-8027390931316151350</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20071106064401.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">071106s        xx     d     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPMIN-00000014635</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DLC</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">DLC</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">upmin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">LG993.5 2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">A64 C65</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Concepcion, Erick Castillo.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparison of static and dynamic penalty functions for handling constraints in genetic  algorithm applied to course timetabling for CSM in UPMin</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Erick Castillo Concepcion.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="c">2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">54 leaves</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis, Undergraduate (BS Applied Mathematics) -- U. P. in Mindanao</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This study presents an application of generic algorithm (GA) on university course timetabling problem using penalty functions were utilized as fitness function, penalizing only on the soft constraints since all hard constraints must be satisfied. One is static penalty function having a fixed penalty parameter in the entire optimization process, and dynamic penalty function where the penalty factors are dependent on the current generation. In comparing the solution between the best for static penalty and the best for dynamic penalty, the later has relatively lower constraint violation making that solution better than the static penalty. Thus, dynamic penalty function is a better performer than static penalty function as a fitness function in a GA optimization process, although the soft constraints were partitioned into equality and inequality constraints, it is not clear which among the constraints is more violated because they have a different degree of penalty</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Genetic algorithm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Timetabling.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Timetbaling</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">Courses.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Static functions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Dynamic functions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Handling constraints.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="658" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Undergraduate Thesis</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">AMAT200.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPMIN</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPMIN-MAIN</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">LG993.5 2006 A64 C65</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
