<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000caa a22000004a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-8027390931312519075</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200331114905.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">o--- |     ||   ||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">200331s        xx     d     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPCEB-00011919504</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DML</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">The equilibrium model of relationship maintenance. [article].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 93-113</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A new equilibrium model of relationship maintenance is proposed. People can protect relationship bonds by practicing 3 threat-mitigation rules: trying to accommodate when a partner is hurtful, ensuring mutual dependence, and resisting devaluing a partner who impedes one?s personal goals. A Longitudinal study of newlyweds revealed evidence for the equilibrium model, such that relationship well-being (as indexed by satisfaction and commitment) declining from its usual state predicted increase threat-mitigation; in turn, increasing threat mitigation from its usual state predicted increased relationship well-being. Longitudinal findings further revealed adaptive advantage to uncertain trust. First, the match between trust and partner-risk predicted the trajectory of threat mitigation over time. People who hesitated to trust a high-risk partner became more likely to mitigate threats over 3 years, but people who hesitated to trust a safe partner became less likely to mitigate threats. The match between threat mitigation and partner-risk also predicted when being less trusting eroded later relationship well-being. Namely, when women paired with high-risk partners became more likely to mitigate threats, being less trusting at marriage lost its capacity to erode later relationship well being. - - (from the authors)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Relationship-Periodicals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Risk-Periodicals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Threat-mitigation-Periodicals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Trust-Periodicals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Murray, Sandra L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Holmes, John G.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Griffin, Dale W.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Derrick, Jaye L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">vol. 108,1.  2015.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analytics</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
