<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000caa a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-8027390931312503262</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20190628084349.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">o--- |     ||   ||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">190628s        xx     d     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPCEB-00011655066</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">mcky</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Falk, Emily.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Persuasion, influence, and value</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">perspectives from communication and social neuroscience.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 329-356.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Opportunities to persuade and be persuaded are ubiquitous. What determines whether influence spreads and takes hold? This review provides an overview of evidence for the central role of subjective valuation in persuasion and social influence for both propagators and receivers of influence. We first review evidence that decisions to communicate information are determined by the subjective value a communicator expects to gain from sharing. We next review evidence that the effects of social influence and persuasion on receivers, in turn, arise from changes in the receiver's subjective valuation of objects, ideas, and behaviors. We then review evidence that self-related and social considerations are two key inputs to the value calculation in both communicators and receivers. Finally, we highlight biological coupling between communicators and receivers as a mechanism through which perceptions of value can be transmitted. -- (from the author)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Persuasion.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Social influence.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Communication.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Value.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Neuroscience.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">fMRI.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Scholz, Christin.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Annual Review of Psychology.</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">vol. 69.  2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analytics</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
