<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000nam a22000004a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-8027295163992906312</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20241001140756.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m    |o  d |      </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240930s2022    ph    a r   m 00| u|eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">DCFA</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">LG 995 2022 A75</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">T37</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Tapang, Lisa Ito</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">In search of the forest</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">tracing trajectories of loss, lives, and transformation across botanical illustration in the Philippines</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Lisa Ito-Tapang ; Flaudette May V. Datuin, adviser ; Helen Yu-Rivera, reader.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Quezon City</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">College of Arts and Letters, University of the Philippines Diliman</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">355 leaves</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">illustrations (some color)</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis (Master of Arts in Art Studies)--University of the Philippines Diliman</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">June 2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bibliography: leaves 337-348</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The thesis explores art historiographical narratives to produce a provisional history of botanical illustration as a visual practice in the Philippines. By delving into points in her own encounters with the material as an art history student and environmental advocate, the researcher expands the discussion on a currently under-investigated area of local study and art historical research. Taking off from Daniela Bleichmar's (2014) notion of botanical illustrations as visual epistemology within the broader field of visual culture and Gillian Rose (2001) and Sunil Manghani's (2013) models of image modalities and ecologies, systems and communities, the study delves on the three aspects of time, visuality, and agency to reflect on how botanical illustration is embedded as an interdisciplinary practice within Philippine art and science.&#13;
&#13;
Weighing J.W.T. Mitchell's notion of visual culture and representation as both &quot;social construction of the visual field&quot; and &quot;visual construction of the social field&quot;, the study applies the notion of an ecology of images to thread through and craft narratives of these images as loss, lives, and history. It asserts how botanical illustration is a continuing practice in the Philippines, where artists have collectively portrayed thousands of plants through hundreds of publications across the Spanish and U.S. colonial periods up to the post-war era. Philippine art history is enriched by the lessons one can learn on historiography, on artistic practice and agency, and on visuality. In doing so, it threads through and reassesses the nature of Philippine botanical illustration as a representation beyond mimesis: as a tradition and local practice weighed with historical change, geopolitical conditions, and negotiated creativity and imagination.&#13;
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Botanical illustration.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Visual culture.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Plant illustration.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Morphological characteristics.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Datuin, Flaudette May V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">adviser.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Rivera, Helen Yu</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">reader.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UP</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DCFA</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">LG 995 2022 A75</subfield>
   <subfield code="i">T37</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
