<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685675941123975726</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231008011922.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">200307s        xx     d | ||r |||||   ||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPVTC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Smit, Peter-Ben</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Contextualizing the contextual</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">a note on the revolutionary exegesis of Gregorio L. Aglipay</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Peter-Ben Smit.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Quezon City</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Ateneo de Manila University</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">2017.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp. 71-83.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Research note.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;The contextuality of all bibliocal exegesis is often emphasized-and rightly so. However, the history of contextual exegesis still needs to be written, which leads to a situation in which those involved in &quot;contextual exegesis&quot; are often insufficiently aware of the contextuality of earlier approaches and the fact that they are heirs to a long tradition of contextual biblical interpretation. Using the example of the &quot;revolutionary&quot; exegesis of Gregorio L. Aglipay, this research note illustrates how contextual exegesis may have much earlier roots than is frequently assumed.&quot;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Aglipay, Gregorio L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Iglesia Filipina Independiente.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Bible</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">Commentaries.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Contextual theology.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Seven last words.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Philippine studies : historical and ethnographic viewpoints</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">65, 1 (March 2017).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPTAC</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPTAC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
