<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000001a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685675941123975632</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231008011921.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">200217s        xx     d | ||r |||||   ||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPVTC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Seki, Koki</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Difference and alliance in transnational social fields</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">the pendular identity of the Filipino middle class</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Koki Seki.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Quezon City</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Ateneo de Manila University</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">June, 2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pp.153-186</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">tables.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;This artice offers a cultural analysis of Filipino middle-class identity emerging in transnational social fields. Although the practice of identity construction of the mdidle class leads to polarization and fragmentation of society, the ambivalent character of their identity resutls in social networks and alliances with members of different social classes in the Philippines. Thsi article provides an approach to understand seemingly discrete and contrasting dual aspects--of differentiation and alliance, exclusion and inclusion, and plurality and unity--found in transnational social fields through an alternative framework of civil society and public sphere in the Philippines and other parts of the globalizing world.&quot;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Internal migration</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">Nurses.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Social classes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Public sphere.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Neoliberalism.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Anti-poverty commission.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Philippine studies : historical and ethnographic viewpoints</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">60, 2 (June 2012).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPTAC</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPTAC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
