<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000caa a22000003i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685594773862388561</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210318185239.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m     |  |        </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210318s2018    xx      r    |||| u|eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPBAG-00039513752</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">STII-DOST</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">BAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">ARTICLE-2746</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Navarro, Celina Ann J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Association of household food security status with mother/caregiver child pairs nutritional status using three indicators of household food security</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Celina Ann J. Navarro, Glen Melvin P. Gironella, and Ma. Socorro E. Ignacio.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="c">2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">pages 493-501</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">color illustrations</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">26 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 500-501)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The main objective of the study was to determine the association of household food security status with mother/caregiver-child pair?s (MCCP) nutritional status using Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) and Food Consumption Score (FCS). MCCP?s nutritional status was categorized into two: household with chronic energy deficient (CED) mother/caregiver and/or at least one child who was stunted, and household without CED mother/caregiver and stunted child. Secondary data from the 2013 National Nutrition Survey conducted by DOST-FNRI was used for the study. Mothers/caregivers who were included in the study were non-pregnant aged 19 years and above, their children, and their household characteristics. Descriptive and analytical analysis via binomial logistic regression was done using Stata 12.1. Results showed that the HFIAS gave the highest estimated prevalence of food insecurity with 75.1% (95% CI: 73.9-76.3) while for FCS, it was 15.7% (95% CI: 14.7-16.8). The estimated proportion of households with CED mother/caregiver and/or at least one stunted child was 38.7% (95%CI: 37.5-39.9), while those households without CED mother/caregiver and stunted child was 61.3% (95% CI:60.1-62.5). Significant associations were observed after adjusting for the confounding variables. For the HFIAS indicator, food insecure households were 1.28 (95% CI: 1.09-1.48) times more likely to have a mother/caregiver with CED and/or at least one stunted child than food secure households. Food insecure households classified by the FCS indicator had 22% (95% CI: 1.01-1.35) higher chance than food secure households to have a CED mother/caregiver and/or at least one stunted child. There was a significant association between household food insecurity and occurrence of undernutrition in a household. To improve the households? nutritional status interventions that are both nutrition specific and nutrition sensitive should be implemented. More researches have to be done to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the household food security indicator in accurately identifying food insecure household.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Nutrition.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Nutritional status.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Chronic energy deficient.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Descriptive analysis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">Household food insecurity access scale.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gironella, Glen Melvin P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ignacio, Ma. Socorro E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">athor.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Philippine Journal of Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">Vol. 147, no. 3, September 2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Request full-text access via UPB University Library through</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://forms.gle/KZjBv7aRtY6jiL5E9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="z">(viewed 18 March 2021)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPBAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPBAG-MAIN</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">ARTICLE-2746</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analytics</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
