<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000caa a22000003i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685594773862003116</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20150505124618.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">g||| |     ||   ||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">160418s2005    xx      r    |||| u|eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPBAG-00017029432</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="d">BAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Circulation-Monograph</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Geaslin, Danica</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Effects of social facilitation and electronic monitoring on usability</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Danica Geaslin [and three others].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="c">©2005.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">6 leaves</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="510" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPA 2005 Paper Submission (pages 1-6, 2005).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In interface design, typical Usability Testing includes the use of facilitators, observation rooms, and electronic monitoring. Social facilitation theory states that people performing tasks tend to commit more errors when being observed. This study examined aspects of Usability Testing to determine if the effects of social facilitation and electronic monitoring are present. The study examined three aspects: (1) persistent knowledge of being observed, (2) presence of a facilitator, and (3) persistent knowledge of being videotaped. Four groups of subjects were run through a Usability Test. The groups varied in the amount of direct observation and electronic monitoring. In each of the experimental groups significant statistical effects were found in the number of errors the users made. The results suggest ways Usability Testing should be conducted to minimize the effects of social facilitation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Social facilitation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Harris, Erin J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Weinberg, Jerry B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thomas, Susan L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPBAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPBAG-MAIN</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">Circulation-Monograph</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analytics</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
