<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000caa a22000003i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685594773861985453</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20150204100743.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">g||| |     ||   ||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">160621s2008    xx      r    |||| u|eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPBAG-00016088007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="d">BAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Circulation-Monograph</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lievens, Filip</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Interviewer's sensitivity to impression management tactics in structured interviews</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Filip Lievens and Helga Peeters.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">[Place of publication not identified]</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Hogrefe &amp; Huber Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">©2008.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">7 leaves</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">28 cm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="510" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Downloaded from psycnet.apa.org/psyc info/2008-08628-005.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This study examines interviewers' sensitivity to impression management in structured interviews by determining the relative importance that interviewers attach to (verbal and nonverbal) impression management as compared to the relative importance that they attach to predetermined competencies. Two samples of interviewers (55 Master I/O psychology students and 18 professional interviewers) watched and evaluated videotaped interviewees who were instructed to put their best foot forward. Results of relative weight analyses showed that the importance of verbal and nonverbal impression management tactics was relatively small as compared to the importance attached to job-related competencies. The type of interview format had some effect on interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics. In particular, in behavior description interviews the interviewers in both samples attached most relative weight to self-focused verbal tactics. Interviewer experience was not related to interviewers' sensitivity to impression management tactics.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Employment interviews.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Structured employment interviews.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Peeters, Helga</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Eurepean Journal of Psychological Assessment</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">Vol.24, No.3</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">(2008) : pages 174-180.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">FO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPBAG</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">UPBAG-MAIN</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">Circulation-Monograph</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analytics</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
