<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000ctm a22000003a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">UP-1685523046126355569</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">Buklod</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20230215133011.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">m    |o  d |      </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230215s2022    xx     d     r    |||| u|</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(iLib)UPMNL-00017456963</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPDent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">LG 993.5 2022 D4 F46</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Flores, Mary Grace S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction in the oral surgery section of UP College of Dentistry in 2019-2020</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Mary Grace S. Flores, Christian Anthony M. Ermita.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
   <subfield code="a">Manila</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Department of Community Dentistry, University of the Philippines Manila</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">c2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">128 leaves</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">color illustration</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">28cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">atext</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">unmediated</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">volume</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Seminar Paper--Doctor of Dental Medicine--University of the Philippines Manila</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">No</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Yes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">N/A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Methodology: A cross-sectional analytical study design was employed to  determine patient satisfaction of Oral Surgery section patients from August 2019 to March  2020. An online survey questionnaire via Google Forms was used as the data collection  tool. This is a two-part questionnaire composed of nineteen questions. The first part  contained three questions that determined the sociodemographic characteristic while the  second part contained sixteen questions on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from Very  Satisfied (5) to Very Unsatisfied (1) and Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (1) which  involved structure and process elements of quality of dental service to judge the overall  assessment of satisfaction level. Patients listed in the Oral Surgery logbook who met all  the inclusion criteria were contacted first through a text message that contained brief details  about the research then, patients who agreed were called for eligibility screening. The  codename and the link which contained the online questionnaire and informed consent  were sent after the call. After answering the questionnaire, the participant received a 15- peso load as a token of participation. The data were collected for 7 weeks. Data analysis  made use of descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), Mann-Whitney U Test,  and Kruskal-Wallis Test.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Objective: The general objective of this study was to determine patient satisfaction  in the Oral Surgery section of the UP College of Dentistry during the Academic year 2019- 2020. Its association with different attributes of the quality of dental services and sociodemographic characteristics was analyzed</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Results: A total of 308 patients were contacted of which 126 replied and answered  the survey. Patient satisfaction was found to be at a high level. On the five-point Likert  scale, the average satisfaction score was 4.60. Patients have given the highest satisfaction  scores to the courtesy of professors and clinicians (4.83±0.42), active professor supervision  (4.78±0.42), and cleanliness and hygienic appearance of structures (4.76±0.46), while the  elements with relatively lower satisfaction scores compared to others were the waiting time  before the treatment (4.29±0.80), duration of treatment proper (4.36±0.83), and ease of  setting an appointment (4.44±0.74). It was also determined that there is an association  between sex and patient satisfaction levels on the following elements: cleanliness of  structures, courtesy of staff, and active professor supervision. Age was associated with  patient satisfaction level on the visual appeal of facilities, while treatment rendered was  associated with patient satisfaction levels on the following elements: on-time patient  meeting, prompt patient service, sense of security with the clinician, empathetic attitude  with the patient's problem, active professor supervision and courtesy of professor and  clinician.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Conclusion: The results of the study showed that the patients who received  treatment from the oral surgery section of UP College of Dentistry perceived a high level  of overall satisfaction with the dental care they received for all the elements of service  assessed. Nonetheless, the elements of service that may still have room for improvement  are waiting time, duration of treatment, and ease on the setting of appointment. Overall  satisfaction was not shown to be by the educational attainment of the patients and the level  of clinicians who rendered treatment to them. However, it was also determined that sex,  age, and type of procedure have an association with patient satisfaction levels on some of  the elements of service.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ermita, Christian Anthony M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">UPMNL</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DENT</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">LG 993.5 2022 D4 F46</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
