Evaluation studies review annual (Beverly Hills, CA Sage Pub., 1983)
Part 1. Methodological issues: 1. Numbers and narrative (Combining their strengths in research reviews).--2. Reviewing the literature (a comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis).-- 3. Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings.--4. Improving the quality of evidence.--5. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews.--6. Methods fr integrative reviews.--7. Meta-analysis (a validity of perspective).--8. On quantitative reviewing.--9. What differantiates meta-analysis from other forms of review?.-- 10. Fitting continuous models to effect size data.--11. Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments.--12. Alternative strategies for combining data from twin studies to estimate an intraclass correlation (some empirical sampling result).--Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.--14. A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. 15. Further meta-analysis procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Part II. Example of reviews.
Key title: Evaluation studies review annual.
Keywords: Evaluation research (Social action program) -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Periodicals. -- United States