<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000004cb4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">IPP-00000148981</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">IPP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20160316172525.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">160316s2009    xx     d | ||r |||||eng||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">Posadas, Roger D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Scientific and technological capabilities and economic catch-up</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">Scientific and technological capabilities and economic catch-up</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1="#" ind2="1">
   <subfield code="c">2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">This paper seeks to explain why the Philippines has remained technologically and economically underdeveloped up to now and what it will take for the country to catch up scientifically, technologically and economically. The paper first reviews the extent to which the Philippines has been left behind in S&amp;T and economic development. Next it discusses and confutes two approaches to the problem of economic and S&amp;T under-development that have been pushed in the past : (1) the &quot;science-push&quot; approach advocated by basic scientists starting with Vannevar Bush and (2) the &quot;market-pull&quot; approach favored by mainstream (neoclassical, neoliberal) economists and traditional businessmen and based on the neoclassical economic theory of comparative advantage. The paper then presents and alternative approach-a &quot;catch-up oriented&quot;, &quot;capability-based&quot;, technonationalist approach-which draws from the successful catch-up experiences of East Asian NICs. The approach entails the abandonment of the precepts of neoliberalism and the Washington Consensus, seeks to achieve rapid national economic and S&amp;T catch-up and calls for the integrated upgrading of the supply, demand, and linkage parts of the national S&amp;T system to world-class standards.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Technological and economic catch-up</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Technological capabilities</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Technonationalism</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Technoliberalism</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="t">Philippine Management Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">Vol. 16 (2009), 131-153</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">TMC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
