<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>00000cab a22000004cb4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">IPP-00000109831</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">IPP</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20150827150951.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">150827s2014    xx     d | ||r |||||eng||</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">Yybiernas, Vicente  Angel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">States as managers of International Labor Migration</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">the cases of South Korea and Taiwan.</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">States as managers of International Labor Migration</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1="#" ind2="1">
   <subfield code="c">2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">South  Korea  and Taiwan  became  labor-receiving  countries  during the  long  economic  boom  of  the  1980s  when  they  transformed  into Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs). Having built their economic development around labor-intensive export-oriented industries, these countries experienced a substantial need for lesser-paid foreign migrant workers, especially after local workers either refused to work in such industries  or  employers  found  labor  costs  too  expensive. However, the recruitment of foreign workers, while solving the initial problem of labor shortage, actually generated new and more complex dilemmas along  the  way, including: (1) the phenomenon of irregular  migrant workers  and  (2)  the  process  of  integrating  foreign  migrant  workers into the fabric of domestic society, formally (in terms of immigration status) and socio culturally.   The paper explores the actions taken by the  South  Korean  and Taiwanese  states  since  the  1980s  to  address these issues and avert social conflicts.  Lastly, it reveals that the policies of South Korea and Taiwan towards migrant labor diverged after the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Migrant labor</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">South Korea</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Migrant labor</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">Taiwan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="t">Asian Studies</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">Vol. 50, no. 2 (2014), 1-24 pages</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="852" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">UPD</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">DAC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1="#" ind2="#">
   <subfield code="a">FI</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
